Partnership Quality under Institutional Void Navigation in Emerging Market Ventures: Policy Evaluation
Keywords:
Institutional Voids, Emerging Markets, Partnership Quality, Policy Evaluation, Strategic AlliancesAbstract
Emerging markets present unique environments where rapid economic growth is frequently juxtaposed with substantial institutional deficiencies, commonly referred to as institutional voids. This paper provides a comprehensive policy evaluation examining how ventures operating within these markets navigate such voids and the subsequent impact on the quality of their strategic partnerships. By employing a mixed-methods research design, the study investigates the intersection of macroeconomic policy interventions and micro-level firm behaviors. The research demonstrates that in the absence of robust formal regulatory frameworks, ventures increasingly rely on informal network ties and high-quality partnerships to mitigate transaction risks and access critical resources. The analysis reveals that policy initiatives aimed at formalizing these environments often yield unintended consequences, temporarily disrupting established informal partnership dynamics before fostering long-term stability. Furthermore, the findings indicate that partnership quality serves as a crucial mediating mechanism between institutional void severity and venture performance. Through an extensive evaluation of survey data and qualitative case studies across multiple emerging economies, this paper offers actionable strategic recommendations for both policymakers seeking to implement structural reforms and enterprise managers attempting to cultivate resilient alliances. The insights challenge conventional policy approaches by advocating for a transitional integration framework that acknowledges the functional role of informal partnerships in void-heavy environments.References
1. Núñez-Laguna, I.; Gambetta, N.; García-Benau, M.A. Knowledge in the diversity-efficiency nexus: How board composition shapes sustainable resource use in emerging markets. J. Innov. Knowl. 2026, 11, 100847.
2. Yang, M.-J. The interdependence imperative: Business strategy, complementarities, and economic policy. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2021, 37, 392–415.
3. Niankara, I. The impact of financial inclusion on digital payment solution uptake within the Gulf Cooperation Council Economies. Int. J. Innov. Stud. 2023, 7, 1–17.
4. Engert, S.; Rauter, R.; Baumgartner, R.J. Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2833–2850.
5. Waddock, S.A. Advancing eco-social strategic management: A whole systems lens. Sustain. Sci. 2025, 20, 2335–2354.
6. Singhania, M.; Saini, N. Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: Comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 2023, 13, 516–559.
7. Roh, T.; Xiao, S.; Park, B.I.; Ghauri, P.N. Stakeholder pressure, democracy levels, and multinational enterprise corporate social responsibility: Stakeholder and institutional theories. J. Bus. Res. 2025, 200, 115619.
8. Wang, T.; Bansal, P. Social responsibility in new ventures: Profiting from a long-term orientation. Strateg. Manag. J. 2012, 33, 1135–1153.
9. Paleari, S. The Impact of the European Green Deal on EU Environmental Policy. J. Environ. Dev. 2022, 31, 196–220.
10. Tiwari, S.; Sharif, A. A Step Toward Sustainable Development: Role of Energy Transition, Eco-Innovation and Environmental Policy Stringency. Gondwana Res. 2025; in press.
11. Edgeman, R.L.C. Strategic resistance for sustaining enterprise relevance: A paradigm for sustainable enterprise excellence, resilience and robustness. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2015, 64, 318–333.
12. Stead, J.G.; Stead, W.E. Why Porter Is Not Enough: Economic Foundations of Sustainable Strategic Management. In Rethinking Strategic Management; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 67–85.
13. Elkington, J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 1998, 8, 37–51.
14. Kareem, M.A.; Kummitha, H.R. Impact of sustainable leadership practices on green innovation: The mediating role of green organisational culture. Discov. Sustain. 2025, 6, 1077.
15. Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Wicks, A.C. Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2007.
16. Santa-Maria, T.; Dougnac, N.; Llorente-González, L.J.; Geissdoerfer, M. From Challenges to Impact: Drivers, Barriers, and Shared Resources in Sustainability-Oriented Corporate-Startup Alliances. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2025, 34, 7488–7516.
17. Batule, R.B.; Kanade, T.M.; Joseph, J.; Kulkarni, S. Navigating Strategic Success; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2025; ISBN 9781774919538.
18. Roche, K.E.; Baumgartner, R.J. Corporate sustainability strategy deployment: A case study on the implementation of corporate sustainability using hoshin kanri. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2025, 32, 927–946.
19. Rózsa, Z.; Folvarcná, A.; Holúbek, J.; Veselá, Z. Job crafting and sustainable work performance: A systematic literature review. Equilib.-Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2023, 18, 717–750.
20. Sari, R.K.; Alfarizi, M.; Ab Talib, M.S. Sustainable strategic planning and management influence on sustainable performance: Findings from halal culinary MSMEs in Southeast Asia. J. Model. Manag. 2024, 19, 2034–2060.
21. Bindeeba, D.S.; Bakashaba, R.; Tukamushaba, E.K.; Atuhaire, S. From green HRM to sustainable business performance: A two-Stage meta-analytic SEM of the mediating role of green innovation. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2025, 12, 2536678.
22. Hart, S.L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014.
23. Mura, L.; Stehlíková, B. The ethics of artificial intelligence: Safeguarding human dignity, social justice and environmental stability in the age of AI. Equilib.-Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2025, 20, 479–507.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.