Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026)
Articles

Associations of Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource Access with Brand Trust in Online Consumer Communities

Francisco León Morales Department of Business and Management, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Andalusia, Spain
Economics, Management and Innovation, Volume 1, Issue 3, 2026 cover

Published 2026-05-28

Keywords

  • Brand Trust,
  • Corporate Social Responsibility,
  • Resource Access,
  • Online Communities,
  • Management and Innovation

Abstract

The proliferation of digital communication platforms has fundamentally altered the mechanisms through which consumers interact with brands and evaluate their societal contributions. This study investigates the complex interplay between corporate social responsibility initiatives, resource access, and the formation of brand trust within the context of online consumer communities. While previous research has established a direct link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust, the underlying processes facilitating this relationship in digital environments remain insufficiently explored. Drawing upon social capital theory and signaling theory, this research proposes a comprehensive framework where resource access acts as a pivotal mechanism translating corporate social responsibility perceptions into enduring brand trust. Through a large-scale empirical analysis of active participants in various online brand communities, this paper examines how distinct dimensions of corporate social responsibility enhance members' access to informational, emotional, and social resources. The findings indicate that perceived corporate social responsibility significantly strengthens community-based resource access, which in turn substantially elevates brand trust. Furthermore, the study identifies community engagement as a crucial boundary condition that modulates these effects. The insights derived from this investigation offer profound theoretical advancements for marketing literature and provide actionable strategies for brand managers seeking to cultivate resilient consumer trust in increasingly fragmented digital landscapes.

References

  1. 1. Duan, Y.; Ji, T.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Environmental Regulations and International Trade: A Quantitative Economic Analysis of World Pollution Emissions. J. Public Econ. 2021, 203, 104521.
  2. 2. OECD. Key Issues in Digital Trade. 2023. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/trade/OECD-key-issues-in-digital-trade.pdf (accessed on 24 December 2025).
  3. 3. Maluku Forest. The Maluku Token: Preserving Nature, Empowering Communities, and Innovating for the Future. 2025. Available online: https://malukuforest.com/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  4. 4. Glennerster, R.; Jayachandran, S. Think globally, act globally: Opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in low- and middle-income countries. J. Econ. Perspect. 2023, 37, 111–135.
  5. 5. Climate Focus. The Voluntary Carbon Market Dashboard; Climate Focus: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; Available online: https://climatefocus.com/initiatives/voluntary-carbon-market-dashboard/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  6. 6. Wei, Z.; Hao, R. The role of human capital in China’s total factor productivity growth: A cross-province analysis. Dev. Econ. 2011, 49, 393–412.
  7. 7. Colorado Water Trust. The Price of Conserving Water; Colorado Water Trust: Denver, CO, USA, 2025; Available online: https://coloradowatertrust.org/news/the-price-of-conserving-water/# (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  8. 8. Li, N.; Li, Z. On Establishing Urban-Rural Ecological Governance Community under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Contemp. Econ. Manag. 2022, 44, 42–48.
  9. 9. Figuerola-Ferretti, I.; Lumbreras, S.; Paraskevas, P.; Paraskevopoulos, I. Sustainability in Action: Macro-Level Evidence from Europe (2008–2023) on ESG, Green Employment, and SDG-Aligned Economic Performance. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9103.
  10. 10. Willer, H.; Trávníček, J.; Schlatter, B. (Eds.) The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2025. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM—Organics International, Frick and Bonn. 2025. Available online: https://www.organic-world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2025.html (accessed on 9 October 2025).
  11. 11. The Nature Positive Platform (Nat5). Nature Positive Credits; The Nature Positive Platform: London, UK, 2025; Available online: https://www.nat5.bio/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  12. 12. Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Dong, J.Q.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901.
  13. 13. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). 44 Sustainability Certifications for Businesses and Sustainability Professionals; Forest Stewardship Council: Bonn, Germany, 2024; Available online: https://fsc.org/en/blog/sustainability-certifications# (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  14. 14. Government of Yucatán. Inventur: Tourism Information System of Yucatán. Available online: https://www.inventur.yucatan.gob.mx (accessed on 12 February 2026).
  15. 15. Guida-Johnson, B.; Zuleta, G.A. Riparian Rehabilitation Planning in an Urban–Rural Gradient: Integrating Social Needs and Ecological Conditions. Ambio 2017, 46, 578–587.
  16. 16. Zheng, Y.; Long, H. Measurement and spatio-temporal pattern of urban-rural integrated development in China. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2023, 78, 1869–1887.
  17. 17. Liddle, B. Consumption-Based Accounting and the Trade–Carbon Emissions Nexus. Energy Econ. 2018, 69, 71–78.